Can cognitive biases and heuristics regarding race influence U.S. Supreme Court decisions? In episode 40, Jonathan Feingold and Evelyn Carter from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) discuss the sometimes selective use of social science research by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist as analyzed in their article “Eyes Wide Open: What Social Science Can Tell Us About the Supreme Court’s Use of Social Science” published on August 8, 2018 in the Northwestern University Law Review.

Cognitive Biases on the Supreme Court - Jonathan Feingold & Evelyn Carter
Cognitive Biases on the Supreme Court - Jonathan Feingold & Evelyn Carter
Cognitive Biases on the Supreme Court - Jonathan Feingold & Evelyn Carter Cognitive Biases on the Supreme Court - Jonathan Feingold & Evelyn Carter
{{svg_share_icon}}
Click bottom of waveform to add your comments


 

Websites and other resources

Bonus Clips

Patrons of Parsing Science gain exclusive access to bonus clips from all our episodes and can also download mp3s of every individual episode.

Support us for as little as $1 per month at Patreon. Cancel anytime.

 

Patrons can access bonus content here.


We’re not a registered tax-exempt organization, so unfortunately gifts aren’t tax deductible.

Hosts / Producers

Ryan Watkins & Doug Leigh

How to Cite

Watkins, R., Leigh, D., Feingold, J., & Carter, E.. (2019, January 9). Parsing Science – Cognitive Biases on the Supreme Court. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7571369

Music

What’s The Angle? by Shane Ivers

Transcript

Coming soon!